论文部分内容阅读
农民工伤亡赔偿姓“农”还是姓“城”,业界争议颇多。从探索伤亡赔偿改革之路的角度出发,南阳市中院的这起“同伤同赔”判决具有一定的司法借鉴意义。近日,河南省南阳市中级人民法院对一起遭遇车祸的进城务工农民索赔案做出终审判决,判令相关责任人按城镇居民人均可支配收入标准赔偿农民工11万余元。据了解,这是全国多家法院作出多起“同命同价”判决后,首次
Migrant workers compensation for casualties surnamed “farming” or surname “city”, the industry a lot of controversy. From the perspective of exploring the road of compensation for injury and death, this judgment of “same injury and compensation with same injury” in Nanyang Intermediate People’s Court has certain judicial referential significance. Recently, Henan Nanyang Intermediate People’s Court made a final verdict on a claim case of migrant workers entering cities with a car accident and ordered relevant responsible persons to compensate migrant workers for more than 110,000 yuan according to the per capita disposable income of urban residents. It is understood that this is the first time that many courts in the country have made many “same-life and same-price” judgments