论文部分内容阅读
云梦秦简出土后,整理者将其中的廷行事解释为成例,即判例,这是不准确的。文献典籍中的有关记述表明,行事一词中找不到成例的义项,更没有当年判例的意义。整理者将廷行事释为成例的两个依据不能成立。根据对秦简相关原文的分析,廷行事其实就是官府行事,或称官府的实际做法。这种实际做法和法律规定不一致,则是自由裁量权存在的结果。
After the Yunmeng Qinshi was unearthed, the arranger interprets the Ting act as an example, that is, the precedent, which is inaccurate. Relevant descriptions in the documents and books show that the meaning of the precedent can not be found in the act of action, nor does it mean the precedent of the year. The two grounds on which the arranger interprets the court action as an example can not be established. According to the analysis of the original text of the Qin bamboo slips, the fact that Ting acts is the official act, or the official practice. This inconsistent practice and legal provisions is the result of discretion.