AIM To evaluate the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases(CRLM) and identify clinicopathological variables that influenced survival.METHODS Patients with bilobar CRLM were identified from a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary database during the study period(January 2010-June 2014). Collated data included demographics, primary tumour treatment, surgical data, histopathology analysis and clinical outcome. Down-staging therapy included Oxaliplatinor Irinotecan- based regimens, and Cetuximab was also used in patients that were K-RAS wild-type. Response to neo-adjuvant therapy was assessed at the multidisciplinary team meeting and considered for surgery if all macroscopic CRLM were resectable with a clear margin while preserving sufficient liver parenchyma.RESULTS Of the 136 patients included, thirty-two(23.5%) patients were considered inoperable and referred for palliative chemotherapy, and thirty-four(25%) patients underwent liver resection. Seventy(51.4%) patients underwent down-staging therapy, of which 37(52.8%) patients responded sufficiently to undergo liver resection. Patients that failed to respond to down-staging therapy(n = 33, 47.1%) were referred for palliative therapy. There was a significant difference in overall survival between the three groups(surgery vs down-staging therapy vs inoperable disease, P < 0.001). All patients that underwent hepatic resection, including patients that had down-staging therapy, had a significantly better overall survival compared to patients that were inoperable(P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, only resection margin significantly influenced disease-free survival(P = 0.017). On multi-variate analysis, R0 resection(P = 0.030) and female(P = 0.036) gender significantly influenced overall survival. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing liver resection with bilobar CRLM have a significantly better survival outcome. R0 resection is associated with improved disease-free and overall survival in this patient group. AIM To evaluate the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and identify clinicopathological variables that affected survival. METHODS Patients with bilobar CRLM were identified from a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary database during the study period (January 2010-June 2014). Collated data included demographics, primary tumor treatment, surgical data, histopathology analysis and clinical outcome. Down-staging therapy included Oxaliplatinor Irinotecan-based regimens, and Cetuximab was also used in patients that were K-RAS wild-type. Response to neo-adjuvant therapy was assessed at the multidisciplinary team meeting and considered for surgery if all macroscopic CRLM were resectable with a clear margin while preserving sufficient liver parenchyma.RESULTS Of the 136 patients included, thirty-two (23.5%) patients were considered inoperable and referred for palliative chemotherapy, and thirty-four (25%) patients underwent liver resection. Seventy (51.4%) patie Patients that failed to respond to down-staging therapy (n = 33, 47.1%) were referred for palliative therapy. There was a significant difference in overall survival between the three groups (surgery vs down-staging therapy vs inoperable disease, P <0.001). All patients that underwent hepatic resection, including patients that had down-staging therapy, had a significantly better overall survival compared to patients that On univariate analysis, only resection margin significantly affected disease-free survival (P = 0.017). On multi-variate analysis, R0 resection (P = 0.030) and female overall survival. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing liver resection with bilobar CRLM have a significantly better survival outcome. R0 resection is associated with improved disease-free and overall survival in this patient grouafraid.