流散文学已经成为世界文学的核心关注点,在众多流散作家中,奈保尔、库切无疑是最具文坛影响力的两位。流散活动为文化批判提供了最佳的视角和充足的素材,本文以后殖民文化批判为视角比较研究了奈保尔和库切的流散书写,拟以此拙文抛砖引玉,以期引起评论界对流散作家比较研究的更大关注。 Dispersed literature has become the core concern of world literature. Of the many disbanded writers, Naipaul and Coetzee are undoubtedly the two most influential literary figures. Dispersal activity provides the best perspective and sufficient material for cultural criticism. This paper compares the dispersal writing of Naipaul and Coetzee from the perspective of post-colonial culture criticism, and proposes to make a brief introduction of this article, aiming to arouse the comparative study on the diaspora writers More attention.