论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较人工流产与药物流产终止早期妊娠的临床疗效。方法:回顾我院2011年8月至2014年3月,主动要求终止妊娠的80例患者,其中40例患者采用人工流产方法,40例患者采用药物流产方法。比较两组患者的完全流产率,阴道出血时间,腹痛持续时间及患者耐受程度等临床特征。结果:采用人工流产的患者完全流产率显著高于采用药物流产的患者,且阴道流血时间和腹痛持续时间明显缩短,但是患者的耐受程度降低。两组间的临床症状均具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:患者在选择终止早期妊娠方法上,通过比较人工流产和药物流产的优劣,并依据个体的具体情况选择合适的方式。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of induced abortion and medical abortion to terminate early pregnancy. Methods: From August 2011 to March 2014 in our hospital, 80 patients who volunteered for termination of pregnancy were enrolled. Among them, 40 patients were treated by artificial abortion and 40 by drug abortion. The clinical characteristics of complete abortion rate, vaginal bleeding time, duration of abdominal pain and patient tolerance were compared between the two groups. Results: The total abortion rate of patients with induced abortion was significantly higher than that of patients with medical abortion, and the vaginal bleeding time and abdominal pain duration were significantly shorter, but the patients’ tolerance decreased. The clinical symptoms between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Patients choose termination of early pregnancy method, by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of induced abortion and medical abortion, and according to the specific circumstances of individuals choose the right way.