论文部分内容阅读
非法狩猎行为可能同时触犯非法猎捕珍贵、濒危野生动物罪和非法狩猎罪,对行为人择一重罪处罚还是数罪并罚是一个颇有争议的问题。本文分析现有的关于猎捕犯罪的罪数观点,从刑法第三百四十一条的立法渊源出发,根据罪数理论分析得出结论:当同时触犯数罪名,而行为人的主观故意、客观行为及危害后果具有一致性时,应择一重罪处罚,触犯其他罪名的情节则在量刑时予以考虑。
Illegal hunting activities may simultaneously violate the illegal hunting of precious and endangered wildlife crimes and illegal hunting crimes. It is a controversial issue that the perpetrators choose to commit one act of felony punishment or multiple crimes. Based on the origin of the legislation of Article 341 of the Criminal Law, this article draws a conclusion based on the analysis of the theory of the number of crimes: when at the same time committing the crimes of several counts while the perpetrator’s subjective intention, Objectivity and the consequences of objectivity are consistent, should choose a felony penalty, offenses against other charges in the sentencing to be considered.