我完全同意克鲁格曼教授如此雄辩地提出的那些主要论点。我想提出两个相关的问题。第一,我认为克鲁格曼对发展经济学思想史的阐述并不完全正确。第二,尽管克鲁格曼确认了对新古典主义范式展开重要批评进行陈述的两个要素,并且形成了他建构“新观点”的基础,但他的视野仍然过于狭窄:存在着被他忽略掉的同等重要的因素。简单说,克鲁格曼提出的论点是: I fully agree with those main arguments that Professor Krugman so eloquently put forward. I would like to raise two related issues. First, I think Krugman’s interpretation of the history of the development of economic thought is not entirely correct. Second, though Krugman has confirmed the two elements of an important critique of the neoclassical paradigm, and has formed the basis for his construction of “new ideas,” his vision remains too narrow: The equally important factor he overlooks. In short, Krugman’s argument is: