过去我们教《鲁迅的精神》这篇课文,往往把张定璜和他的《鲁迅先生》说得一无是处。翟秋白说他是“嗡嗡嗡的苍蝇”,课本注释说他的“三个冷静”是“胡说”,他的文章又发表于《现代评论》,还能不彻底否定吗? 最近,从《六十年来鲁迅研究论文选》上册中、读了《鲁迅先生》一文,深深感到我们“想当然”的推论完全不对,即使是“三个冷静”的说法,也未必什么大错。 In the past, we taught the text “Lu Xun’s spirit” and often described Zhang Dingyi and his “Lu Xun” as nothing. Qu Qiubai said that he was a “flying fly.” The textbook notes that his “three calms” is “nonsense.” His article was published in “Modern Review.” Can it not be completely negated? Recently, from "Six In the past ten years, Lu Xun’s research papers were selected and the article “Mr. Lu Xun” was read, and it was deeply felt that our reasoning for “taking it for granted” was completely incorrect. Even the “three calm” arguments are not necessarily a big mistake.