本文通过对唐代士人多种文体中医者书写以及这种书写如何在日常生活中展开的分析,尝试从书写和日常生活性的角度重新审视唐代医者与病患的关系。文章从柳宗元笔下的宋清开始,试图说明宋清是士人日常的医药需求所要求助的对象,但当这个对象进入其书写之中时,书写者强烈的道德判断与读者设定,很可能使得被写作的对象湮没在其中,也就使得书写者日常生活的某些侧面也被遗忘。医者的形象在这种道德判断和书写之下呈现复杂甚至对立的面相,有时被塑造成道德的典范,有时又被称为“医工”之流。由此,医者的身份也呈现出扑朔迷离的图像,他们的身份似乎在不断转换,为了迎合种种的价值标准。但在这种冲突和拉扯之间,药商、草泽医、道医、宫廷医工等种种身份差异颇大的群体,似乎也逐渐呈现出同质性。要理解这些医学群体的生活世界,士人书写对他们的改造和遮蔽,以及他们的种种应对之道,都是难以忽视的话题。因此,在面对这些复杂的权力关系和纠结时,本文将日常书写实践放在了分析的中心,期待以之为镜,能折射出书写者和被书写者的生活世界。 This article attempts to reexamine the relationship between the doctor and the patient in the Tang Dynasty from the perspective of writing and daily life through the analysis of the writing style of Chinese literati in the literati of the Tang Dynasty and how this writing is carried out in daily life. The article begins with Song and Qing dynasties written by Liu Zongyuan and tries to illustrate that Song Qing is the object of the daily medical needs of scholars. However, when this subject enters into his writing, the writer’s strong moral judgment and reader’s setting may make it The object of writing is buried in it, leaving some aspects of the writer’s daily life also forgotten. The image of the physician presents a complicated or even antagonistic face under such moral judgments and writing, and is sometimes shaped as a model of morality and is sometimes referred to as the “medical” flow. As a result, the identities of the practitioners are also presented with confusing images, and their identities seem to be constantly changing in order to cater to all kinds of value standards. However, among such conflicts and pulls, there appears to be a gradual homogeneity among various groups with large differences in their identities, such as drug dealers, physicians, doctors, and court medical workers. To understand the living world of these medical groups, the modification and sheltering of them by their literati, and the ways in which they are coping are all topics that can not be ignored. Therefore, in the face of these complex relations of power and entanglements, this article puts daily writing practice at the center of analysis and looks forward to using it as a mirror to reflect the life world of writers and writers.