高中第三册《纳谏与止谤》自读提示认为:“对于邹忌进谏的巧妙方法,文中也附带论及,但仍使之从属于威王的‘善听’。这样,全文议论的重点就十分突出。”我们认为这是一段妨害中心突出的议论。理由如次: 一、从标题看。议论文的标题规定论域、角度、重心,发议论须受标题制约,否则会超越论域,偏离中心。主标题规定论域为“纳谏与止谤”,副标题只表明写本文的方式,不拓展论域。“要不要纳谏,怎样纳谏,纳谏的意义,止谤的危害”才是本文应论之义,进谏方法论非题中应 The self-reading suggestion in the third volume of the Senior High School “Naruo and Zhiyu” states: “For the ingenious method of Zou Ji’s entry, the text also discusses incidentally, but it still subordinates Wei Wang’s ’good listening’. In this way, the full text of the discussion The emphasis is very prominent.” We think this is a prominent argument for the Harmfulness Center. Reasons such as: First, look at the title. The title of the argumentation stipulates the domain, angle, and center of gravity, and the discussion must be restricted by the title. Otherwise, it will transcend the discourse and deviate from the center. The main headline stipulates that the domain of the discourse is “concubinage and cessery”. The subheading only shows the way of writing this article and does not expand the discourse. “Whether or not you want to be satisfied, how to accept blasphemy, what is meant by blasphemy, and the harm caused by blasphemy,” is what this article should say.