论文部分内容阅读
马克思说:“只是社会必要劳动量,或生产使用价值的社会必要劳动时间,决定该使用价值的价值量。在这里,单个商品是当作该种商品的平均样品。”(《资本论》第一卷,第52页)对于这段话,理论界一直是这样理解的:社会必要劳动时间决定商品价值量,同种商品价值量相同。根据理论界的上述理解,那么,就可能出现这种情况:“凤凰”牌自行车与各种杂牌自行车价值量都可以一样,只能用三个月的灯泡与可用一年的灯泡价值量也可以相等。这种理解认真推敲起来是不能够接受的。问题在于对马克
Marx said: “It is simply the socially necessary amount of labor, or the socially necessary labor time to produce value in use, that determines the value of that value of use, where an individual is treated as an average sample of that good.” (Capital One Volume, p. 52) For the passage of this passage, theorists have always understood that the socially necessary working time determines the value of a commodity, and that of a commodity of the same value. According to the theoretical understanding of the above, then, this may happen: “Phoenix” bike and a variety of novice bike value can be the same, only with three months of light bulbs and available one year worth of light bulb can be equal. It is unacceptable to take such an understanding seriously. The problem is with Mark