论文部分内容阅读
本文从政府管理哲学、政府管理理论假设基础、政府管 理模式三个层次论述了与体制改革相适应的政府管理创新的内容。 文章第一部分论述政府管理哲学，指出，以是否“由政府组织和直接 管理”来划分不同经济成分“姓社”、“姓资”的所有制误区，源于整体 系统观的束缚；伴随体制改革，政府管理创新，首先应该实现管理哲 学从整体系统观向总体系统观的转变。第二部分剖析了高度集中统 一的计划管理体制的形成和运作隐含的四个基本假定：一元化利益 格局、理想化人格、无限理性和社会系统的机器说，并提出适应市场 体制的正确的政府管理理论假设基础。第三部分运用三元运行理论 剖析了从计划体制向市场体制转换过程中政府管理模式应有的变 化。其中最突出的变化有两点：其一是从人治到法治——通过弱化政 府集中控制行为和强化规范行为，使整个社会治理结构从以政府集 中控制为基础向以法治规范为基础的转变；其二是从管制到民主，或 从控制到服务，即从子系统自主行为作为政府集中控制行为的延伸 转变为政府集中控制为子系统自主行为服务。文章最后以农村改革和发展为例，从正反两方面阐述了政府管理模式转变的意义和效果。
This article discusses the contents of government management innovation that is compatible with the system reform from the three levels of government management philosophy, the assumption of government management theory and the government management mode. The first part of the article discusses the philosophy of government management and points out that the misunderstanding of ownership of “surnamed society” and “capital” with different economic components depends on whether the system is “organized by government and directly managed” Government management innovation, we should first realize the transformation of management philosophy from the overall system view to the overall system view. The second part analyzes the four basic hypotheses hidden in the formation and operation of highly centralized and unified plan management system: the unified interest pattern, ideal personality, unlimited rationality and the social system of machine theory, and puts forward the right government to adapt to the market system Basis of management theory. The third part uses the theory of ternary operation to analyze the change of government management mode during the transition from planned system to market system. One of the most prominent changes has two points: one is from rule by people to the rule of law - by weakening the government’s centralized control behavior and strengthening the normative behavior, the whole social governance structure changes from the basis of centralized government control to the rule of law; The second is from regulation to democracy or from control to service, that is, from the sub-system autonomous behavior as an extension of the government’s centralized control behavior, it becomes the government’s centralized control to serve the sub-system autonomous behavior. Finally, the article takes the rural reform and development as an example, expounds the significance and effect of the change of the government management mode from both positive and negative aspects.