论文部分内容阅读
一、抓准论题定准论点依据题目来写文章,第一步就是要抓准论题。写作时偏题甚至离题,就在于扣原题、原材料不紧,似是而非,若即若离,甚至风马牛不相及。怎样才不会偏题呢? 一要把握原题含义的广度。如①《寸有所长,尺有所短》,②《小事不可小视》,③《不以善小而不为》,④《千里金堤,溃于蚁穴》。这四个题目都含有不要忽视“小”这层意思,但在范围上又各有区别:①题主要阐述小与大的辩证关系,②题说不能忽视小事,而这小事可以包括好坏两个方面,③题则专讲不忽视好的小事,④题则专讲防止小缺点、错误。就涉及范围的宽窄来说,②=③+④。如果把第③题写成第④,或者④题写成③题就会南辕北辙;若把②题写成③题或④题,也会偏在一隅,犯论述不全的错误。
First, grasp the quasi-problem of setting the basis of the topic to write articles, the first step is to grasp the subject. When writing or even digressing, it is because the original title, raw materials are not tight, specious, and if they are divorced, even if they do not match. How can it not be wrong? First, we must grasp the breadth of the meaning of the original question. Such as 1 “inch long, feet are short”, 2 “small things can not be overlooked,” 3 “not good but not for”, 4 “thousands of miles of gold embankment, collapse in the ant hole.” All four topics contain the meaning of “small” not to be overlooked. However, there are differences in scope: 1 questions mainly describe the dialectical relationship between small and large, 2 questions say that small things cannot be ignored, and this small matter can include both good and bad. In terms of aspects, the three questions specifically focus on not ignoring the good things, and the four questions specifically on preventing minor shortcomings and mistakes. As far as the scope of coverage is concerned, 2=3+4. If you write the 3rd question as 4th, or 4 questions as 3 questions, you will make a difference; if you write 2 questions as 3 questions or 4 questions, you will be biased in one mistake and make mistakes in incomplete discourse.