论文部分内容阅读
阿多诺的身份与思想是复杂的,既包括改造传统哲学的理论尝试,又包括面向特定现实而展开的文化批判。而无论是哪一个方面,都或明或隐地显示出阿多诺的理论与马克思主义传统之间的内在关联。由此,尽管阿多诺的理论创作仿佛是诸种理论要素编织而成的,但马克思主义在其中所占据的地位依然是首要的或主要的。而在更宽泛的意义上,阿多诺这一范例将指明,除了经典马克思主义之外的其他马克思主义理论(包括西方马克思主义)也是马克思主义发展史中的重要一支,包括阿多诺在内的有关马克思主义的多元化“讲述”方式是可行的,也是合法的、可以被借鉴的。
Adorno’s identity and thought are complicated, including not only theoretical attempts to reform traditional philosophy but also cultural criticisms that are directed at specific realities. In either case, the inner link between Adorno’s theory and the Marxist tradition is plainly or implicitly shown. As a result, although Adorno’s theoretical creation seems to be woven from various theoretical elements, the position occupied by Marxism remains the primary or the major one. And in a broader sense, Adorno’s paradigm will indicate that other Marxist theories than classical Marxism (including Western Marxism) are also important in the history of the development of Marxism, including Adorno’s The pluralism about “Marxism” within the “narrative” is feasible, legal, and accessible.