论文部分内容阅读
“十七年”女性文学史的建构在诸多方面均存在不足。史家对“十七年”女性文学史的发展规律缺乏科学的认识,一方面是因为史观的陈旧和史识的偏执,另一方面则是史料的问题。研究“十七年”的女性创作首先应该具有版本的意识,还应该在已有文献的基础上展开“辑佚”的工作。一个较为可取的女性文学史建构方式是在已有的多种研究方法的基础上引入性别视角下的两性文本比较研究。比较式的性别分析不应是艺术价值高低的判断,不能仅仅依据一部作品的性别内涵便将其过分地拔高或是全盘地否定,而只需尽可能客观地呈现其所具有的性别文化内涵。这是一种既不失思想文化的超前性又比较具有现实可行性的学术选择。
“Seventeen years ” The construction of the history of female literature is deficient in many aspects. Historians do not have a scientific understanding of the laws governing the development of women’s literature history during the “17 years” because of the obsolescence of historical perspective and the paranoid of historical knowledge, on the other hand, the issue of historical materials. The study of women’s creation for “Seventeen Years” should first of all have the version awareness, and the work of “Collection Lost” should be carried out based on the existing literature. A more desirable way of constructing the history of female literature is to introduce a gender comparative study of gender based on the existing methods. Comparative gender analysis should not be a judgment of the value of art. It can not be excessively or totally negated based solely on the gender connotation of a work. Instead, it should only be as objective as possible to present the gender cultural connotations it possesses . This is a kind of academic choice that not only advances the ideology and culture in advance but also has realistic feasibility.