本文通过梳理杜甫相关诗作及其注解,理清了杜甫二子宗文、宗武与其小名熊儿、骥子的对应关系,从史实和逻辑角度否定了曾祥波先生《杜甫二子考》一文对传统说法“杜甫大儿宗文小字熊儿,小儿宗武小字骥子”的颠覆,考定宗武出生于天宝十三年秋,而非“至德二载秋八月杜甫奔赴肃宗行在之际”(奔赴行在是在四月)。另外指出,即使是提出“宗武为熊儿”的洪业也没有说过宗武出生于至德二载秋。 By combing Du Fu’s poems and their annotations, this paper clarifies the correspondence between Du Fu’s two sons, Zong Wu and his nicknames Xiong’er and Ji’zi, and negates Mr. Zeng Xiangbo’s “Du Fu’s two sons” test from the perspective of historical facts and logic. “Du Fu’s children’s prose letter bear, children Zongwu small capital Ji” subversion, test Zongwu was born in Tianbao thirteen years autumn, rather than “ (Went to the line in April). In addition, it is pointed out that even Hongye, who proposed ”Zong Wu as a bear," did not say that Zongwu was born in two years of moral integrity.