论文部分内容阅读
近读胡平生《云梦龙岗六号秦墓墓主考》(以下简称《考》),谓云梦龙岗秦牍释文“辞”乃“辟”之误释,堪称卓见。但关于牍文地名“沙羡”的考证,却可商榷。由于“沙羡”之地望涉及到由先秦至近代历史地理学方面的一些重要问题,故不可不辨。胡《考》云:“《龙岗》一文引用了不少文献资料对沙羡的地望作了讨论,可惜误将沙羡当作了墓主的故乡,结果忽略了一个基本事实,即木牍的性质决定本墓葬的所在地就在沙羡县境内,而这恰是龙岗木牍所出现‘沙羡’这个地名最重要之处,是比任何历史文献
A close reading of Hu Pingsheng “Yunmengonggang No. 6 Qin tomb tomb exam” (hereinafter referred to as “test”), that Yunmenglonggang Qin emperor’s interpretation of “speech” is “provision” of the wrong interpretation, be called Zhuo see. However, the text on the ground names “Xian en” textual research, but can be discussed. Since the place of “Xian” is related to some important issues from pre-Qin to modern history and geography, it must be discerned. Hu “test” cloud: “” Longgang "a lot of reference to the literature references to Xian Xian to look at, unfortunately mistakenly admired as the hometown of the grave Lord, the result ignores a basic fact that the clogs The nature of the tombs is located in the location of Sa Xian County, and this is precisely the Longgang Muli appear ’sand envy’ the most important place name is more than any historical document