论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析院前急救的规范护理流程对比结果。方法方法:将我中心2015年6月—2016年6月收治的80例急救患者随机分为实验组和常规组,每组各40例,实验组患者行规范护理流程,常规组未行规范护理流程,比较两组急救效果。结果结果:实验组急救后家属满意度、出错发生率、急救成功率等相关情况显著优于常规组,差异显著(P<0.05)。实验组出诊时间为(13.7±3.8)min,急救成功率为92.5%;常规组出诊时间为(24.6±5.1)min,急救成功率为70%,实验组出诊时间短于常规组,实验组急救成功率高于常规组,差异显著(P<0.05)。实验组患者以及家属满意度为95%,常规组患者以及家属满意度为75%,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论论:急救患者在院前急救行规范护理流程,取得较好的抢救效果。
Objective: To analyze the comparison results of standard nursing process of pre-hospital emergency. Methods and Methods: Eighty emergency patients admitted from June 2015 to June 2016 in our center were randomly divided into experimental group and conventional group, with 40 cases in each group. The patients in the experimental group underwent standardized nursing procedure and the normal group did not receive standard nursing care Flow, compare two groups of first aid effect. Results: The relative satisfaction, error rate and success rate of first aid were significantly higher in the experimental group than those in the control group after emergency first aid (P <0.05). The visiting time of the experimental group was (13.7 ± 3.8) min, the emergency rescue rate was 92.5%, the visiting time of the routine group was (24.6 ± 5.1) min, the emergency rescue rate was 70%, the visiting time of the experimental group was shorter than that of the conventional group The success rate was higher than the conventional group, the difference was significant (P <0.05). The satisfaction rate of patients and relatives in the experimental group was 95%, and the satisfaction rate of the patients in the routine group and their relatives was 75% (P <0.05). Conclusions: Emergency patients in the pre-hospital emergency line normative nursing process, and achieved a better rescue effect.