论文部分内容阅读
我国现行的人民陪审员制度仍然以“1加2”为基本模式,未能在增进司法民主、提高司法公信力方面达到预期目的。回顾世界范围内陪审制改革的历史路径可以发现,在我国现行诉讼体制下,建立新型人民陪审制,大幅度增加人民陪审员在合议庭中的数量,从而提高其独立性和影响力是解决“陪而不审”症结的可行途径。
The current system of people’s assessors in our country still regards “1 plus 2” as the basic model and fails to achieve the desired goal of enhancing judicial democracy and enhancing the credibility of the judiciary. Recalling the historical path of jury reform around the world, we can find that establishing a new type of people’s jury system under the current system of litigation in our country greatly increases the number of people’s assessors in the collegial panel, so as to improve its independence and influence, Accompanied without trial "crux of the feasible way.