论文部分内容阅读
《中华人民共和国公司法》第十六条第二、第三款对公司为股东担保的程序控制规则应作限缩解释,一人公司为股东担保不能适用该规则。一人公司为股东担保应依章程规定由董事或者股东作出决定,但《中华人民共和国公司法》中相关的程序控制并不能很好地保护债权人。在司法实践中,法院更倾向于将法人人格否认作为救济债权人的捷径,这尽管有现实合理性,但理论上该规则的适用值得商榷,债权人救济也并非华山一路。债权人保护问题对此类担保的效力不构成障碍。
Article 16, Paragraphs 2 and 3, of the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China shall limit and explain the procedures for the guarantee of the Company for the shareholders, and the one-person company can not apply the rules for the guarantee of the shareholders. The guarantee of one-person company for shareholders shall be decided by the directors or shareholders according to the articles of association, but the relevant procedural control in the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China does not protect the creditors well. In judicial practice, courts prefer to deny corporate personality a shortcut to the relief of creditors. Although there is realistic rationality, the application of the rule is theoretically questionable and the creditors’ relief is not Huashan all the way. The issue of the protection of creditors does not constitute an obstacle to the validity of such guarantees.