论文部分内容阅读
一米内内阁的解消,日本舆论界称之为“发展的解消”,近卫内阁的成立,舆论界称之为“发展的成立”。所以,近卫内阁所抱负的本质是“发展”,一方面是对内的发展,就是所谓新体制的建立,另一方面是对外的发展,就是建立大东亚新秩序。关于对内的发展,不在本篇叙述之列,我们现在所需论述的是所谓建立大东亚新秩序问题。东亚而至于“大”,究竟它的疆界怎样?日本方面的议论是颇不一致的。据石丸藤太的见解,大东亚新秩序的范围,北端起自西伯利亚,连海参崴在内,以至于整个东亚太陆,南自缅甸暹维至马米亚、荷属东印度,成一“一字形”。
The cancellation of the cabinet within one meter, the Japanese media’s call for “the cancellation of development” and the establishment of the cabinet of the Guards and what the media calls “the founding of development.” Therefore, the essence of the aspiration of the cabinet is “development.” On the one hand, internal development is the establishment of the so-called new system; on the other hand, external development is the establishment of a new order for Greater East Asia. As for the internal development, which is not listed in this article, what we need now to discuss is the so-called issue of establishing a new order for Greater East Asia. What is the boundary between East Asia and “big”? The Japanese side’s argument is rather inconsistent. According to Ishimaru Tadan’s view, the scope of the Greater East Asia New Order started from Siberia and even Vladivostok at the northern end. As a result, the whole of East Asia is far from land, and South Myanmar, from Myanmar, .