论文部分内容阅读
目的通过采用药物、手术等几种不同的治疗方法来探讨对三种不同类型宫颈糜烂的治疗疗效。方法将240例患者分为四组,A组(宫颈炎康栓组)、B组(微波组)、C组(宫颈炎康栓+微波组),D组(LEEP刀组),每组患者60例,分析各组对宫颈糜烂的治疗效果。结果各组与A组和B组比较,表现均有显著差异性(P<0.05);与C组比较,D组的乳头型病例表现出了显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论药物及物理方法对治疗宫颈糜烂均有疗效,其中宫颈炎康栓+微波组和LEEP刀治疗对各型宫颈糜烂的疗效要明显优于其他组,而且操作安全简便,治愈率高,并发症发生率低,非常适合众多的宫颈疾病患者。而对于乳头型宫颈糜烂患者,采用LEEP刀治疗可以作为首选治疗方法。
Objective To explore the curative effects of three different types of cervical erosion by using several different treatments such as drugs and surgery. Methods 240 patients were divided into four groups: group A (cervicitis group), group B (microwave group), group C (cervicitis group + microwave group), group D (group LEEP) 60 cases, analysis of the treatment of cervical erosion. Results Compared with group A and group B, the performance of each group was significantly different (P <0.05). Compared with group C, the papillary type in group D showed significant difference (P <0.05). Conclusions The drugs and physical methods are effective in treating cervical erosion. The curative effect of cervicitis, KANGSHUN + microwave group and LEEP knife on various types of cervical erosion is better than other groups, and the operation is safe and easy, the cure rate is high, the complication Low incidence, very suitable for many cervical disease patients. For patients with papillary cervical erosion, the use of LEEP knife treatment can be used as the preferred method of treatment.