论文部分内容阅读
“本院认为,原裁判认定原审被告人陈满杀死被害人钟作宽并放火焚尸灭迹的事实不清,证据不足,指控的犯罪不能成立,依法应予以改判纠正。检、辩双方要求撤销原裁判,宣告陈满无罪的意见成立,均予以采纳。”经最高人民检察院提起抗诉,由最高人民法院指令浙江省高级法院再审的陈满故意杀人、放火申诉案,2月1日上午,浙江省高级法院公开宣判,撤销原审裁判,宣告陈满无罪。从一审被判死缓,到再审宣告无罪,陈满等了22年。记者从最
“The court held that the original verdict that the original defendant Chen Man killed the victim Zong Zuo Kuan and set foot on the scene was set on fire was not clear, there is insufficient evidence to prosecute the crime can not be established, according to the law should be modified to correct. The referee, declaring Chen Man innocent opinions established, are to be adopted. ”" The Supreme People’s Procuratorate filed a protest, the Supreme People’s Court ordered the re-trial by the Zhejiang Provincial High Court of Chen intentional murder, arson case, the morning of February 1, Zhejiang High Court publicly pronounced the verdict, the trial verdict was rescinded, declaring Chen Man innocence. From the first trial was sentenced to death, to acquit in a retrial, Chen Man waited for 22 years. Reporters from the most