可译性和不可译性争论已久。本文认为,翻译是可能的,语言是可译的。但正像赫拉克利特所说,人不能两次踏进同一条河流,绝对等同的翻译不存在,翻译也有限度。否则,译本也不会叫做译本,应该叫做副本。本文依据哈贝马斯的普遍语用学理论予以论证。 Translatability and untranslatability have long been debated. This article argues that translation is possible and that language is translatable. However, as Heraclitus said, one can not step into the same river twice, and an absolutely equivalent translation does not exist and there is a limit to translation. Otherwise, the translation will not be called translation, it should be called a copy. This article is based on Habermas’s universal pragmatics theory.