论文部分内容阅读
四、中国音乐事业面临改革在管理方面,苏联、捷克、东德的管理方法和西方资本主义的没什么两样。中国不一样,曾经有一段时间是搞政治挂帅,党的领导。如今,管理方法需要用艺术标准进行改革。现在大家都比较趋向一致的是,要经过考核,要建立合同,根据每人能力定立级别,水平不行的就不要。如果一个乐团有三百人,其实一、两百人就足够了。这样问题就出来了:水平不行的到哪儿去啊?那一百多人也不能赶到街上去。究竟谁是好的?谁来划这条线?谁敢?划得准确不准确?这都是问题。“四人帮”刚粉碎之后,中国交响乐搞得相当好。在一九八○年,我们一年干了二十年的活。中央乐团从建团二十年后,演出了二十套节目。而八○年一年搞了二十六套。前二十年中好多外国作品不
Fourth, the reform of China’s music industry Faced with management, the management methods of the Soviet Union, the Czech Republic and East Germany are no different from those of Western capitalism. China is different. There was a period of time in which political leadership and party leadership were followed. Today’s management methods require the reform of artistic standards. Now everyone is more consistent, is to go through the assessment, to establish a contract, according to the ability of each person to establish the level of the level of not. If there are 300 orcs in an orchestra, one or two hundred people are enough. The question then comes out: where does the level go? The hundred or so people can not get to the street either. Who is good? Who draws this line? Who dare? Delicate inaccurate? This is the problem. After the Gang of Four was smashed, the Chinese symphony was well done. In 1980, we worked twenty years a year. The Central Orchestra has performed 20 sets of programs since its establishment 20 years ago. In 1980, 26 sets were made. Many foreign works in the first two decades do not