论文部分内容阅读
目的:了解我市县级疾病预防控制机构检验科的工作现状。方法:采用问卷调查与现场调查相结合方式,调查各县级疾病预防控制中心检验科人员、设备、能力、工作量等情况。结果:不同疾病预防控制中心检验科承担的检测职能不同。全市县级疾病预防控制中心检验科工作人员平均有6人。检测设备配置水平均低于国家要求。计量认证范围、项目数量的差距较大。县级疾病预防控制中心的检测能力均未达到国家要求。检验科承检的检测样本以及人均检验量均有较大差距。检测样本多来源于从业人员健康体检、疾病监测。突发卫生事件应急处理中实验室样本检测率为9.09%。结论:检验科人员不足,实验室检测能力较低,难以有效发挥在疾病预防控制和突发公共卫生事件处理中的技术支撑作用。应重新定位疾病预防控制中心在检测工作方面的职能,主动维持检测能力。
OBJECTIVE: To understand the status quo of the work of the laboratory of county-level disease prevention and control agencies in our city. Methods: By means of a combination of questionnaires and on-the-spot investigation, we investigated the personnel, equipment, abilities and workload of the department of disease prevention and control of all county level. Results: The testing functions performed by the different disease prevention and control center laboratories bear different functions. The city’s county-level Centers for Disease Control and Prevention laboratory staff an average of 6 people. Test equipment configuration levels are lower than the national requirements. Measurement certification range, the larger the number of projects. County-level CDC’s detection capabilities did not meet the national requirements. There is a big gap between the testing samples and the testing per capita of the testing department. More samples come from employees in health examination, disease monitoring. The detection rate of laboratory samples in emergency response to emergencies was 9.09%. Conclusion: Insufficient laboratory personnel and low laboratory test ability make it difficult to effectively play a supporting role in disease prevention and control and emergency public health incident handling. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention should be repositioned to carry out its functions of testing work and be proactive in maintaining the testing capability.