论文部分内容阅读
贵刊2000年第7、8期刊登了缪正华、王守玲两位老师关于“预习”的文章。认真研读后发现,两篇文章皆为经验总结型文章,但却给我们提出了一个十分重要的实验课题。虽然两位作者都提到自己的结论是经过实验及反复试验得出,但缪老师的结论是经过一个题目的统计数据分析获得,这不一定科学(不完全归纳的特征决定其不一定科学);而王老师称自己的结论是近几年教学实践的总结,但在全篇文章中,没有发现一
In the 7th and 8th issue of 2000, you published the articles about “Preview” by two teachers, Miao Zhenghua and Wang Shouling. After careful study, I found that both articles are empirical summary articles, but they have given us a very important experimental topic. Although both authors mentioned that their conclusions were obtained through experiments and trial and error tests, Ms. Mau's conclusion was obtained after a subject's statistical analysis, which is not necessarily scientific (the incomplete induction determines that it is not necessarily scientific) ; And Wang said his conclusion is the summary of teaching practice in recent years, but in the entire article, did not find a