“海德格尔所选择的不是批判而是神话”,哈贝马斯在《马丁·海德格尔:巨大的影响》一文中作出这样的断言。虽然海德格尔影响非凡,但是他偏离了自十八世纪以来哲学家们通过批判来克服危机的道路。神话式的海德格尔哲学同社会实践几乎没有什么联系,对作为经验源泉的生活现实也就不具有批判性。哈贝马斯认为,在《存在与时间》一书中,海德格尔从此在的历史性和整体性出发从其自身寻求人类此在的根据,追寻所有存在的第一起点。此在在所有存在之中具有存 “Heidegger has chosen not to be critical but mythical,” Habermas made this assertion in his article “The Great Impact of Martin Heidegger.” Although Heidegger’s influence was extraordinary, he deviated from the philosophical critique of the crisis that had been overcome by the eighteenth century. The mythic Heidegger philosophy has little connection with social practice, nor is it critical to the reality of life as a source of experience. According to Habermas, in his Book of Existence and Time, Heidegger pursues the first starting point for all existences from the historical and holistic point of view. This exists among all being