对于“猪被盗杀,责任在谁”一案,根据事实和法律,本庭现作如下评判: 一、杨某和王某之间不存在代保管的关系。在王某依法取得财产(猪)所有权,即双方买卖关系结束后,王某提出将猪先存放于杨某猪厩里,表面上看似乎在当事人之间又形成了新的法律关系——代保管。但是通过本庭的调查 Regarding the case of “Who is responsible for the killing and killing of pigs”, according to facts and laws, the court now makes the following judgments: 1. There is no custodial relationship between Yang and Wang. After Wang acquired the property (pig) ownership according to law, that is, after the conclusion of the sale and purchase relationship between both parties, Wang proposed to deposit the pigs in Yangmou stables on the surface and appeared to have formed a new legal relationship between the parties - on behalf of custody. But passed the court’s investigation