论文部分内容阅读
案件事实理论研究一般将案件事实视为推理的结果,并集中于解释作为个体的法官或者陪审员如何认定案件事实。然而,自媒体信息传播凸显了个体推理的可接受性问题,要求我们反思案件事实认定模式之所以依赖推理的原因,关注逻辑学的规范性文化功能。构建符合我国实际的案件事实认定模式,需要接受一个文化变迁的视角,既应当破除对程序完美的依恋,也应当重视求同思维习惯的识别与超越问题,将案件事实解释为事实建构的结果。
Case fact theory research generally considers case facts as the result of reasoning and focuses on explaining how an individual judge or jury ascertains the facts of a case. However, since the dissemination of media information highlights the acceptability of individual reasoning, we are required to reflect on the reason why the pattern of factual determination of a case depends on reasoning and focus on the normative cultural function of logic. The construction of a pattern of fact recognition in line with China’s actual conditions needs to accept a cultural change perspective. It should not only eliminate the perfect attachment to the procedure, but also attach importance to the identification and transcendence of common-thinking habits and interpret the facts of the case as the result of factual construction.