自阮元提出南北分派和北碑南帖之后,书学界一直认为,从阮元、包世臣、刘熙载到康有为体现了碑学从提出到完备和总结的过程,而帖学是作为碑学的对立面存在的。这一看法不但有失片面,而且未能厘清碑学发展的理路。从阮元到康有为,碑学家的书学思想实则经历了一个从唯碑是尊向碑帖互融思想的嬗变,而其转捩点则是“二王”书古意的从无到有。一阮元—“二王”一脉之南派书皆无古意阮元认为书法流派的变迁混淆难 Since Ruan Yuan proposed North-South Distribution and Bei Bei South Post, the book and scholars have always believed that from Ruan Yuan, Bao Shi-chen and Liu Xizai to Kang Youwei embodies the process of presenting and completing Bei-jing from presentation to comprehension and conclusion. of. This view is not only a vain one, but also failed to clarify the path of development of the study of Buddhism. From Ruan Yuan to Kang Youwei, the calligrapher’s thought of the plagiarist actually experienced a transmutation of the thought of reciprocal integration of rubbings from the monument to the monument, while its turning point is the “nostalgia” of ancient books. A Ruan Yuan - “Two Kings ” a vein of the South School are no mean Ruan Yuan believes that the transformation of calligraphy confusion difficult