论文部分内容阅读
《语文教学通讯》1994年第4期刊登的《〈土地〉思路商榷》一文,文笔优美,思路明晰,分析透辟、新奇,很令笔者击节叫绝,但笔者在称赞之余冒昧提出管窥之见以请诸同仁斧正。 文章驳了教参的看法,认为作者的思想奔驰了两个来回,因而将文章的主体部分划分成了两个层次 笔者对教参不敢苟同,但对此种提法也不敢全盘接受。笔者认为这两部分应为横向联想和纵向联想。
The article “Land of Thoughts and Commerce” published in the “Language Teaching Newsletter” in the 4th issue of 1994 has a beautiful writing style, clear thinking, and insightful analysis and novelty. It makes the author utterly exclaimed, but the author ridiculed and put forward his opinion. Please join all the axe. The article refutes the teachings and views, and believes that the author’s thoughts have leaped back and forth two times, thus dividing the main part of the article into two levels. The author does not dare to agree with the reference, but this formulation is not dared to accept it in its entirety. I believe that these two parts should be horizontal association and vertical association.