论文部分内容阅读
仅仅因为来例假上卫生间,日方董事长就要以“违纪”为由将女职工“除名”?除名不成,又刻意对女职工进行打击报复。如此侵犯人权,居然能够得到人民法院的支持,你相信吗?如此简单的官司,居然要打4年,你相信吗?事件虽结束于一年半之前,但本刊首次披露,意在引起人们的关注:这种“护洋”、“护资”现象其实并不鲜见。难道引进外资就该无视中国工人的基本人权吗?
Just because of the official holiday on the bathroom, the Japanese chairman should be “discipline” as an excuse to “expel the female worker”? Not only failed to remove the name, but also deliberately crack down on female workers retaliation. Do you believe it is such a violation of human rights and even the support of the people's court? Do you believe such a simple case of lawsuits actually hit four years? Although the incident ended a year and a half before, this article first disclosed that it is intended to cause people Concerns: This phenomenon of “protecting the ocean” and “protecting the capital” is not uncommon. Should foreign investment be ignorant of the basic human rights of Chinese workers?