论文部分内容阅读
虽然法治是现代社会的基础,司法最终是法治社会纠纷解决的基本原则。但是,对于某些类型纠纷的解决,纠纷解决机制层次化的解纷效果更符合社会的需求。多元化纠纷解决途径是中国社会纠纷解决机制配置中国家与社会共同参与的场域,这种共同参与的模式在中国不同历史时期所体现出来的重要程度不同,现代纠纷解决途径的建构应当逐步实现国家与社会纠纷解决权的良性互动。对纠纷解决途径进行现代建构应当既保留具备传统文化内涵的价值因素,又要使之与现代法治相兼容,尤其应当考虑中国法制现代化进程中二元结构的特殊国情对纠纷解决途径的不同需求。
Although the rule of law is the foundation of modern society, the judiciary is ultimately the basic principle of solving social disputes in the rule of law. However, for the settlement of certain types of disputes, the resolution of the dispute resolution mechanism is more in line with the needs of society. Diversified ways of dispute resolution are the fields where China and society participate together in the allocation of China’s social dispute resolution mechanism. The mode of such participation is different in different historical periods in China. The construction of modern dispute resolution should be gradually realized The Positive Interaction between State and Social Dispute Resolution Power. To modernize the way of dispute resolution should retain the value factors with traditional cultural connotation and make it compatible with the modern rule of law. In particular, we should consider the different needs of the dual national structure in the process of modernization of legal system in solving disputes.