奥涅金,作为一个不朽的艺术典型问世以来,人们对他的评论众说纷纭。《齐鲁学刊》一九八六年第二期上发表的刘奉光《是中间人物,不是“多余的人”——谈叶甫盖尼·奥涅金形象的社会意义》一文认为,奥涅金不是“多余的人”,而是一个“中间人物”。其理由是:一、“多余的人”是一种超阶级的提法;二、“多余的人”提法不符合小说实际。在近年来我国的奥涅金形象探讨中,这是一个非常与众不同的观点。然 Onegin has a lot of controversy about his commentary since his advent as a monumental art genre. Liu Fenguang, published in the second issue of Qilu Journal in 1986, is a middleman and not a “superfluous person” - a talk about the social significance of the image of Yevgeny Onegin. “Onegin Not ”extra person“, but a ”middle man.“ The reasons are: First, ”redundant people“ is a kind of super-class formulation; Second, ”redundant people" reference does not conform to the reality of the novel. In the discussion of the image of Onegin in our country in recent years, this is a very different viewpoint. Of course