论文部分内容阅读
[目的]比较普通电刀宫颈锥切术中宫颈内翻缝合成形法与电凝法的疗效。[方法]回顾性分析2008年8月至2010年8月行普通电刀宫颈锥切术65例宫颈病变患者,其中35例采用缝扎双侧子宫动脉下行支+宫颈内翻缝合成形法(研究组),对照组30例采用缝扎双侧子宫动脉下行支+电凝法。[结果]研究组手术时间、术中出血量、术后出血量、术后住院时间均比对照组少。两组均无复发、感染、宫颈狭窄、宫颈功能不全等并发症。[结论]普通电刀锥切宫颈创面采用缝扎双侧子宫动脉下行支+宫颈内翻缝合成形法,具有手术时间短、止血效果好、术后住院时间短等优点。
[Objective] To compare the curative effect of cervical varicocele and electrocoagulation in general electric knife cervical conization. [Methods] A retrospective analysis of 65 patients with cervical lesions from August 2008 to August 2010 underwent cervical conization, including 35 cases of bilateral uterine artery suture and cervical varus suture Group), 30 cases in the control group were treated with sutured bilateral uterine artery branch and electrocoagulation. [Results] The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay in the study group were less than those in the control group. No recurrence in both groups, infection, cervical stenosis, cervical insufficiency and other complications. [Conclusion] Conical incision cervical incision of common electric knife adopts the technique of sutured bilateral uterine artery descending branch and cervical varus suture, which has the advantages of short operation time, good hemostatic effect and short postoperative hospital stay.