行政人在行政实践中常会遭遇服从上级与对公众负责的冲突、行政人身份与角色群的紧张、公共利益与个人利益的僵局甚至行政人隐私权与公民知情权的平衡等四大伦理困境。行政人的不道德行为给社会带来了严重危害。行政人陷入伦理困境有三重因素:微观方面是行政人角色界定模糊;中观方面是监督和制约机制乏力;宏观方面是行政主导价值旁落和传统行政文化的侵扰。行政人选拔应与行政主导价值观相匹配,推进以组织流程转变为核心的政府再造运动;慎用行政实践中的伦理性妥协;开展行政人伦理培训;加强伦理立法及制度化是行政人摆脱伦理困境的基本理路。 Executives often encounter four major ethical dilemmas, such as the conflict between obeying the higher authorities and being responsible to the public, the tensions of the administrators and their role groups, the impasse between the public interests and individual interests, and even the balance between the right of privacy and the citizens’ right to know. The unethical behavior of the administrative staff has brought grave harm to society. There are three factors that an administrative person falls into an ethical predicament: the microscopic aspect is the ambiguity of the administrative person’s role; the meso aspect is the weak supervision and restriction mechanism; the macroscopic aspect is the encroachment of the administrative-dominated value and the traditional administrative culture. The selection of executives should be in line with the values ​​of the executive-led, promoting the government reengineering movement centered on the organization of process transformation, being cautious of the ethical compromise in administrative practice, carrying out ethics training for the executives, strengthening ethics legislation and institutionalization, The basic logic of the dilemma.