论文部分内容阅读
《文心雕龙》对扬雄的个性、作品、理论观点等方面都给予了客观公允的评价,特别是对其辞赋观的剖析,以“膏腴害骨”、“莫益劝诫”回应扬雄“辞人之赋丽以淫”、“劝百讽一”的辞赋理论。此外,刘勰以通变的发展观纠正扬雄的复古辞赋观,推动辞赋乃至文学的变革。在刘勰的评论与修正下,将文学的内容与形式做了很好的平衡,并且对复古与新变有更深入的分析,对后世文学理论的构建影响至深。
“Wen Xin Diao Long” gave an objective and fair evaluation of Yang Xiong’s personality, works, theoretical points of view and other aspects, especially the analysis of his Ci Fu view, “ ”In response to Yang Xiong “ excuse me, ”“ persuade one hundred satirical one ”theory of ci Fu. In addition, Liu Xun revolted Yang Xiong’s retro cifu viewpoints with the changeable development view, and promoted the transformation of ci and even literature. Under the comment and amendment of Liu Xie, the content and form of literature are well balanced, and the analysis of retro and new changes has a deeper analysis, which has a profound influence on the construction of later literary theories.