论文部分内容阅读
在现代学术史上,胡适的《说儒》堪称一篇鸿文。胡适该文甫出即在学界引起了激烈讨论,冯友兰、钱穆、李源澄、江绍原、贺次君等都曾撰文进行商榷,其中也包括郭沫若。郭沫若虽然承认《说儒》“举证相当丰富。我们知道胡适是费了不少的工夫,是他一篇得意之作”①但他在《驳〈说儒〉》一文中给予胡文几近全面否定的批评意见,长期以来也为学界所关注。在以往的研究中,许多学者多注重“平议”两人针锋相对的论点,然后从学术史角度指出各自的创获与不足等。②
In the modern academic history, Hu Shih’s “Confucianism” is called an essay. Hu Shi Wen Fu just out of the academic community has caused heated discussions, Feng Youlan, Qian Mu, Li Yuan Cheng, Jiang Shao Yuan, He Zijun et al have argued, including Guo Moruo. Although Guo Moruo admitted that “saying Confucianism” is quite rich in evidence, we know that Hu Shih spent a lot of time and effort on his part. “1 However, in his article” Refuting Confucianism, "Hu Wenji The criticisms that have been totally negated have long been of concern to academics. In the previous studies, many scholars pay more attention to the argument that the two men oppose each other, and then point out their own achievements and deficiencies in the academic history. ②