论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨口腔正畸结合修复治疗错合伴牙体、牙列缺损的临床效果。方法:选取2012年10月-2015年3月我院收治的患者57例,按照治疗方式的不同分为A组、B组和C组,每组患者19例。A组患者选择口腔正畸临床治疗,B组采用口腔修复方法进行治疗,C组患者同时选择口腔正畸以及口腔修复开展联合治疗,观察三组患者对治疗的满意度评分情况,比较三组患者治疗的总有效率。结果:A组患者显效6例,有效8例,无效5例,总有效率为73.4%;B组患者显效7例,有效7例,无效5例,总有效率为73.4%;C组患者显效12例,有效6例,无效1例,总有效率为94.7%,C组最终治疗有效率明显优于A组和B组(P<0.05);C组满意度评分明显高于A组和B组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:口腔正畸结合修复治疗错合伴牙体、牙列缺损应用效果较好,具有较强的临床应用价值。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of orthodontic combined with orthodontic treatment in the treatment of malocclusion with denture and dentition defect. Methods: Totally 57 patients admitted to our hospital from October 2012 to March 2015 were divided into group A, group B and group C, with 19 patients in each group according to the different treatment methods. A group of patients choose orthodontics clinical treatment, B group using oral repair method for treatment, C group of patients also choose orthodontics and oral repair to carry out joint treatment, the treatment of three groups were observed satisfaction score, compared three groups of patients The total effective rate of treatment. Results: In group A, 6 cases were markedly effective, 8 cases were effective, 5 cases were ineffective and the total effective rate was 73.4%. In group B, 7 cases were markedly effective, 7 cases were effective, 5 cases were ineffective and the total effective rate was 73.4%. 12 cases, 6 cases were effective, 1 case was ineffective and the total effective rate was 94.7%. The final effective rate of C group was significantly better than that of group A and B (P <0.05). The satisfaction score of group C was significantly higher than that of group A and B Group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Orthodontics combined with orthodontic treatment is a good method to treat malocclusion and dentition defects and has good clinical value.