论文部分内容阅读
社会信任作为一种实践哲学,在不同社会历史形态下承载着不同的时代内涵,在近代实践哲学视阈下,社会信任主要通过“公共意志”和“个人意志”关系呈现出来,对此康德从先验哲学出发阐释了社会信任道德建构的先决条件,虽然解释了社会信任普遍性问题,但就其存在根基而言,它则缺失现实性。为解决此困境,黑格尔立足超验性论证了法、伦理和国家之间内在一致性及其存在的根基,即源于无人身“绝对精神”的理性实践。对此,马克思批判了黑格尔式的国家形而上学理论及其在此统治下的虚假社会信任现状,建构一个自由联合体的社会信任形态,此社会信任形态的建构能够增进社会正义感和幸福感,它作为“治国之道”能够实现社会整体的善。
As a kind of practical philosophy, social trust carries different connotations of the times under different social and historical forms. Under the perspective of modern practical philosophy, social trust is mainly manifested through the relationship between “public will” and “personal will” In this regard, Kant started from the transcendental philosophy to explain the preconditions for the construction of social trust morality. Although it explains the problem of the universality of social trust, however, Kant lacked the reality in terms of its existence. In order to solve this dilemma, Hegel argues on the basis of transcendentalism that the internal consistency between law, ethics and nation and the foundation of its existence are derived from the rational practice of no one “absolute spirit ”. In this regard, Marx criticizes the Hegelian theory of state metaphysics and the status quo of false social trust under this rule, and constructs a form of social trust of a free association. The construction of this form of social trust can enhance the sense of social justice and happiness It serves as a good way to govern the country as a whole.