在当前的课改实践中,对于语文课和语文教学质量的质疑颇多。其实,自建国以来的我国各个历史阶段的课程教学改革中,对于语文教学的争论、非议,从来就没有停止过。我们也不得不承认,语文教学中“空对空”与“‘实’不到路子上”的现象确实比较普遍,与所付出的教学成本相比,语文教学的效率、质量确实不如意(尤其是在识字教学任务基本完成后的阅读教学中);在教学研究方面,经验不少,但仔细分析,往往取决于某些“特殊条件”(如,高频率大容量的 In the current practice of curriculum reform, many questions have been raised about the quality of Chinese teaching and Chinese teaching. In fact, since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, in the course of teaching reform in all historical stages in our country, the controversy and criticism of Chinese teaching have never stopped. We also have to admit that the phenomenon of “empty versus empty” and “not being on the path” in Chinese teaching is indeed quite common. Compared with the teaching cost, the efficiency and quality of Chinese teaching are really unsatisfactory (especially In reading teaching after the teaching task of literacy is basically finished); there is a lot of experience in teaching and research, but careful analysis often depends on certain “special conditions” (eg, high frequency, large capacity