论文部分内容阅读
新时期关于中国古代文论“有无体系”的问题,目前存在的观点主要有“无体系”说和“有体系”说两大类。随着研究的发展,认为中国古代文论不存在体系的学人已经很少了;而“有体系”说之中,又以“潜体系”说影响犹大,代表人物有李壮鹰、张海明、刘绍瑾等。新时期文学理论体系构建又因构建基础不同可分为“西式融合”、“中式融合”、“中西融合”以及文化语境下的文论体系构建四种路径,代表人物有蔡钟翔、陈良运、刘若愚、李春青等。
In the new era, there are two main categories of “no system” and “system” in ancient Chinese literary theory “with or without system”. With the development of the research, there are few scholars who think there is no system in ancient Chinese literary theory. However, among the “systematic” sayings, they also influence Judah with “latent system” Zhang Haiming, Liu Shaojin and so on. The construction of the theoretical system of literary theory in the new period can be divided into four paths: the “Western Convergence”, “Chinese Fusion”, “Chinese and Western Convergence” and the construction of literary theory under the cultural context Cai Zhongxiang, Chen Liang Yun, Liu Ruoyu, Li Chunqing and so on.