论文部分内容阅读
当前,我国社会科学普及立法主要有两种模式:一是将社会科学普及纳入科学技术普及法的调整范围。二是对社会科学普及单独立法,制定社会科学普及规范。两种立法模式最大的突破在于弥补了《中华人民共和国科学技术普及法》等科技立法对社会科学普及的立法空白。但两种立法模式的共同特点都是软法规范,具有非强制性、实效性、现实性、民主性、公开性等特征。作为软法的社会科学立法没有国家强制力保障实施,没有司法适用的可能性,在实施方面存在着先天的不足,建议要加强对社会科学普及立法实施过程的监督,从而保障作为软法的社会科学普及立法最终发挥实效。
At present, there are mainly two kinds of models for the popularization of social sciences in our country. The first is to include the popularization of social sciences in the scope of the adjustment of science and technology popularization laws. The second is to popularize the separate legislation of social sciences and formulate the popularization norms of social sciences. The biggest breakthrough of the two legislative modes lies in making up for the legislative gaps in the popularization of social science and other science and technology legislation such as the “Science and Technology Popularization Law of the People’s Republic of China.” However, the common characteristics of the two legislative modes are all soft law norms, which are characterized by non-compulsion, effectiveness, reality, democracy and openness. Social science legislation as a soft law is not guaranteed by state coercion and has no possibility of judicial application. There are inherent deficiencies in its implementation. It is suggested that we should strengthen supervision of the implementation of social science popularization legislation in order to protect society as a soft law Science Popularization Legislation Ultimately Effective.