二十世纪理论界经历了一场“权力”发明的大爆炸。自福柯奠基性地把铁板一块的权力碾压为碎片化的微观实践以来,对应着二十世纪空前活跃的政治实践,理论家们纷纷以向权力提问的方式,显示着干预和改造世界的雄心。文学权力的命题与这一理论大潮,形成了某种有趣的错位与暧昧。一方面,文学始终负载主流价值观念,承担着“传道”的重任;另一方面,文学叙事的虚构性、想象性和多义性,又始终践行着挑战同一性暴力的可能。从福柯到德里达的各路权力理论大师们,对文学文本的这一暧昧 The twentieth century theorists have undergone a big bang for the “power” invention. Since Foucault ground-laid the iron piece by piece in the power of microfilm, corresponding to the unprecedentedly active political practice of the twentieth century, theorists have shown their ambition of intervening and transforming the world by asking questions of power . The proposition of literary power and the tide of this theory have shaped some interesting dislocation and ambiguity. On the one hand, literature always carries the mainstream values ​​and undertakes the important task of “preaching”; on the other hand, the fictionality, imagination and polysemy of literary narration have always practiced the possibility of challenging the same-sex violence. From Foucault to Derrida, the masters of the theory of power, the ambiguous literary text