这是一起船舶碰撞致损案例 ,依据中船总 1996年版对国外和国内民用船舶两种修理价格标准 ,产生了两种差别较大的对鑫通轮的修理报价 ,致使在采用哪种报价来认定鑫通轮是否构成推定全损的问题上 ,保险合同双方当事人产生了分歧 ,一审和二审法院 ,均采用国内民用船舶修理价格标准 ,判保险人胜诉。虽然鑫通公司对判决不服 ,但由于没有证据证明必须采用国外船舶修理价格 ,只能承担败诉的后果。此案例中的纠纷应引起有关部门和人员的注意 This is a case of ship collision damage, according to the China Shipbuilding 1996 version of the domestic and foreign civil repair prices of two standards, resulting in two different greatly Xin Tong round of repair offer, resulting in what kind of quotation On the issue of whether Xin Tong Lun constituted the presumption of total loss, the parties to the insurance contract had different opinions. Both the courts of first instance and the court of second instance adopted the domestic civil ship repair price standards and sentenced the insurer to victory. Although Xin Tong Company refused to accept the verdict, but because there is no evidence that the need to use foreign ship repair prices, can only bear the consequences of losing. Disputes in this case should draw the attention of relevant departments and personnel