论文部分内容阅读
在客观归责理论中,构成要件效力范围没有必要作为独立的阶层,其下位规则应在风险制造与风险实现两个阶层重新安置。构成要件保护目的是风险实现阶层的指导原理。过失犯的结果归责必须在结果预见可能性基础上,根据构成要件保护目的进行全面的利益权衡。在具体判断时,构成要件保护目的理论先于合法替代行为理论,后者在前者无法得出有效结论时才会起作用,因为规范本身原则上有效,所以先判断规范的保护范围,在特殊情况下才会判断规范的效力。构成要件保护目的对异常因果流程、合意的他人危险化、第三人责任范围等特殊情形的判断,也有重要指导作用。
In the theory of objective imputation, it is not necessary to form an effective scope of the elements as an independent class, and its subordinate rules should be resettled on the two levels of risk making and risk realization. Constitutive elements The purpose of protection is the guiding principle of the risk-fulfillment class. Imputation of the consequences of the fault must be based on the results of the foreseeable possibility, according to the protection of the constituent elements of a comprehensive interest balance. In specific judgments, the theory of the component protection purpose precedes the legal alternative behavior theory, which is effective when the former can not reach an effective conclusion. Since the norm itself is valid in principle, the scope of protection of the norm is first judged. In the special situation Will determine the effectiveness of norms. The purpose of the protection of constituent elements is also an important guiding role in the judgment of exceptional circumstances such as the abnormal causal process, the consensual danger of others and the scope of third party liability.