本文是一篇涉及词汇训诂与书法理论的争鸣文章，针对侯文“新释”提出辩驳，认为侯文把“笔软”理解为“软毫笔”，“奇怪”理解为丑陋，不合规范既违背了蔡邕《九势》意旨，也与历代书家的理论不相吻合，侯文所谓“新”非创新，而是标新。 This article is a controversial article involving vocabulary training and calligraphy theory. It argues against Hou Wen’s “new interpretation” that Hou Wen understands “pen and soft” as “soft and pen” and “strange” as ugly and irregular Contrary to the intention of Cai Jiu’s “nine potential”, but also with the theory of ancient calligraphers inconsistent, Hou Wen called “new” non-innovation, but the new standard.