论文部分内容阅读
有一种观点认为,戏剧的危机是“市场经济”冲击的结果,在这种观点看来,在“市场经济”规(?)的作用下,戏剧势必被票房价值所左右,而对大众媚俗的结果,又势必使戏剧走向庸俗和没落。据此,有些人提出对戏剧施行保护性措施,国家不应该把戏剧完全推入市场等等。这是一种在“市场经济”条件下对戏剧不能或不完全能进入市场的“认知”。这种观点的错误在于,由于它没有把戏剧放在整个文化的综合背景中来研究,而仅放在“市场经济”的单一环境中来看,这样,
According to one view, the drama crisis is the result of the “market economy” impact. From this point of view, under the influence of the “market economy” regulation, the drama is bound to be dominated by the box office value and the popular kitsch As a result, it is also bound to make the drama vulgar and decadent. Accordingly, some people propose protective measures for the theater, and the state should not push the theater completely into the market. This is a “perception” of whether drama can or can not enter the market under “market economy.” The fallacy of this view is that since it does not study drama in the context of a culture as a whole but only in a single context of “market economy,” in this way,