论文部分内容阅读
基于实验实在论,哈金对拉图尔和伍尔伽的《实验室生活》一书进行了较为中肯的评价:一方面,认为本书关注于实验室研究,这应该是一直关注于“理论优位”的科学哲学未来的发展方向;另一方面,基于对同一TRH(Thyrotropin Releasing Hormone)实验的分析,批判了本书表现出的社会建构论特征。哈金实验实在论与拉图尔和伍尔伽的社会建构论之间的主要分歧在于“科学事实”具有“自然实在性”还是“社会建构性”。
Based on experimental realism, Harkin makes a more pertinent assessment of Latour and Woolgar’s book “Laboratory Life”: On the one hand, it is believed that the book focuses on laboratory research, and this should always be the focus of “ Theoretical superiority ”philosophy of science; on the other hand, based on the analysis of the same TRH (Thyrotropin Releasing Hormone) experiment, we criticize the characteristics of social constructivism presented in this book. The main disagreement between Hagin’s experimentalism and Latour and Woolga’s social constructivism lies in whether “scientific fact ” has “natural reality ” or “social constructivism ”.